Thoughts from the mind of Ben Welby

Category: Digital Transformation (Page 4 of 4)

The OECD Framework for digital talent and skills in the public sector

Too often, digital is treated as a specialist brick laid by others. But real transformation happens when digital becomes the mortar and binds teams, cultures, and missions together. This framework argues that while investment in digital, data and technology professions and leadership are essentials, the key to unlocking sustainable, whole of government transformation is making digital everyone’s business.

This framework emerged from work led by the OECD’s Digital Government and Data Unit. I had the privilege of co-authoring the paper alongside Lucia Chauvet, supported by the Working Party of Senior Digital Government Officials (E-Leaders) and its Thematic Group on Digital Talent and Skills. It builds on years of OECD collaboration in this space — drawing lessons from country reviews, global case studies, and shared experience from digital leaders across the world.

Since publication, the framework has been embedded in OECD Digital Government Reviews and country support work. It’s designed to be actionable — not just a diagnostic tool, but a map for reform.

One example: we used it as the basis for work with the Government of Tunisia, which led to a resource called Understanding Digital Government — a companion website (formerly at understanding-digital-government.com) in French and Arabic. We worked with Public Digital to design a set of training materials that would help public servants engage with and learn about the five digital government user skills. Sadly, that site is no longer live. I had always hoped we’d be able to translate those materials into every OECD language, but like many good ideas, that ambition outpaced our capacity.

We also used that Tunisian project as an opportunity to work with the School of Good Services to provide training to the most senior decision makers across the Tunisian local government sector.

Available as PDF

What’s the TL;DR?

Digital, data and technology are transforming how we live, and also how we work. This is as true in the public sector as anywhere else.

Governments that want to deliver in a digital world need more than just technical upgrades; they need capable, confident, and collaborative teams. That means:

  • Creating a working environment that encourages transformation,
  • Defining and nurturing the skills that matter,
  • And building the systems to attract, grow, and retain a digital-capable public workforce.

This paper presents the OECD’s framework for digital talent and skills, structured around those three imperatives, each grounded in real-world examples and practices from member and partner countries.

The Three Pillars of the Framework

Illustration featuring three key components of a digital government transformation strategy: 1. "Create an environment to encourage digital transformation" (green arrow), 2. "Skills to support digital government maturity" (centered in bold), and 3. "Establish and sustain a digital workforce" (orange arrow). Circular arrows indicate a cyclical or interconnected relationship among these components.

Pillar 1: Create an environment to encourage digital transformation

Governments need more than strategies — they need workplaces where digital ways of working can thrive. That means:

  • Digital leadership that’s visible, user-centred, and empowering;
  • Organisational structures that enable multidisciplinary work and reduce hierarchy;
  • A learning culture where experimentation is safe and valued;
  • Tools and ways of working that support agility and delivery.

Pillar 2: Skills to support digital government maturity

Skills aren’t just about technical roles. The framework identifies that countries need to be mindful about the foundational “21st century skills” needed across society for people to thrive in the digital era and then identifies four categories of capability that rest on top:

  • User skills — digital basics for every public servant
  • Socio-emotional skills — collaboration, adaptability, resilience
  • Professional skills — the know-how for delivering digital services
  • Leadership skills — the ability to model and enable transformation
Pyramid diagram illustrating the hierarchy of digital government skills. The top layer is labeled "Digital government leadership skills," followed by "Digital government professional skills" in red, "Digital government socio-emotional skills" in yellow, "Digital government user skills" in orange, and the base layer titled "21st century skills in society" in green.

Each of those areas covers the detail needed to achieve a long-lasting and sustainable transformation and is grounded on raised expectations for all members of society and providing them with levels of digital competency that mean they fully thrive in our Internet-enabled world.

This has implications for government. And a critical observation in the framework is that digital government should not solely be the preserve of those in the digital, data and technology professions. Central to the framework is an expectation that governments should pursue a new baseline expectation for public sector workers to acquire a grounding in five core skills:

  • Recognising the potential of digital for transformation1
  • Understanding users and their needs2
  • Collaborating openly for iterative delivery3
  • Trustworthy use of data and technology4
  • Data-driven government5

Pillar 3: Establish and maintain a digital workforce

It isn’t possible for governments to click their fingers and swap their existing workforce for a ‘digital’ one. And nor should they want to.

The answer to digital transformation is about having a workforce that is digital. There are important professions and career paths that need to be established but more importantly is creating an ongoing process that can enhance and equip everyone in the public sector to contribute to digital transformation.

This pillar focuses on how governments can:

  • Attract digital talent through flexible recruitment and employer branding;
  • Retain people by investing in culture, career progression, and equity;
  • Support growth through structured development, mentoring, and learning opportunities;
  • Build the systems to allocate skills effectively across teams and priorities.

The blurb

The rapid pace of technological advance and associated potential for the use of data have not only changed the way people live but also the way people work. This digital disruption hits all sectors, including the public sector, and this working paper emphasises pathways for developing a public sector workforce with the necessary skills to achieve successful digital transformation. It presents the OECD Framework for Digital Talent and Skills in the Public Sector, which highlights the need to create the right working environment, secure the right skills, and evolve the right workforce to support a progression from e-government to digital government.

Available as PDF

  1. When a public servant recognises the potential for digital transformation they:
    * identify, describe and analyse practical examples of digital transformation;
    * look at the status quo of existing processes and identify opportunities for digital transformation;
    * have a growing network of digital government practitioners to turn to for advice and challenge;
    * understand, and can challenge, whether new activity involving technology is consistent with wider strategic activity;
    * oversee and develop new digital, data or technology activity in ways that
    complement broader strategic activities
    * can ask relevant, informed, and challenging questions when they have oversight responsibility for digital, data and technology activity ↩︎
  2. When a public servant understands users and their needs they:
    * champion and explain the value of user research and participate as part of user research exercises;
    * can identify the users affected by their area of work, and define the user needs their work meets;
    * can identify where their work interacts with, receives from, or hands off, to another part of government and recognises the importance of an end to end understanding of the user’s journey;
    * recognise the different channels and modalities involved in the provision of a service and can map the user’s journey, including associated internal steps;
    * understand the importance of tackling the digital divide and the priority, roadmap and strategy for accessibility, national connectivity and increasing 21st century skills in society ↩︎
  3. When a public servant collaborates openly for iterative delivery they:
    * can explain the benefits of ‘working in the open’ and argue positively for an open by default approach
    * can implement participatory approaches to their area of work to genuinely include their users
    * understand the value of diverse, multi-disciplinary teams and expect to involve policy, delivery and operational colleagues to ensure a fully-rounded perspective on any given topic
    * can explain the benefits of an iterative approach to delivery
    * understand different phases of delivery (e.g., Discovery, Alpha, Beta, Live) and are clear about the benefits of researching, prototyping, testing and
    learning on an ongoing basis;
    * have an understanding of open source code and the community-based processes that support them
    * know where to find, and appraise, the suitability of common standards, components and patterns ↩︎
  4. When a public servant is trustworthy in their use of data and technology they:
    * understand their responsibilities in the workplace around information security and data handling or processing
    * are confident in terms of digital security and clear about password policies
    * understand the legal requirements on them as individuals in terms of their handling of data to protect the privacy of citizens
    * are comfortable considering the ethical dimensions associated with the use of digital technologies or data, including knowledge of any relevant instruments such as Good Practice Principles
    * understand the support and activities associated with maintaining a reliable service
    * ensure that contracts with third party suppliers are consistent with the digital government agenda ↩︎
  5. When a public servant knows about data-driven government they:
    * are aware of the individuals or organisations that are responsible for the data agenda
    * understand the priority, roadmap and strategy for taking the steps to establish a data-driven public sector
    * are familiar with the governance arrangements for access to and sharing of data
    * are confident in their legal and ethical obligations for the treatment of data
    * recognise opportunities for how interoperability, the Once Only Principle and access to transactional data can support the better design of services
    * adopt an empirical approach to the use of data for generating public value in terms of Anticipating and planning, Delivery, and Evaluation and Monitoring
    * understand the value of Open Government Data to government, and the wider ecosystem. ↩︎

OECD Good Practice Principles for Data Ethics in the Public Sector

These Good Practice Principles were developed by the Working Party of Senior Digital Government Officials Thematic Group on the Data-Driven Public Sector.

This group had been instrumental in ensuring the value of the experiences highlighted and questions answered through The Path to Becoming a Data-Driven Public Sector and the Data-Driven Public Sector Working Paper.

Lucia and I initiated this work under the leadership of Jaron Haas, Simone Schoof and Marieke Schenk from the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (MINBZK) in the Netherlands. We then workshopped elements of it in Paris during the Expert Group Meeting on Open Government Data prior to the pandemic.

The ultimate value of this exercise owes itself to Arturo’s leadership after he took on the responsibility of stewarding the Data-Driven Public Sector thematic group during this challenging period. He is indebted to the support of those countries but especially Natalia Domagala on behalf of the UK and Omar Bitar on behalf of Canada for getting to their final state.

Available as a PDF

What’s the TL;DR?

As governments deepen their use of data and AI, ethical guidance becomes critical. These 10 principles from the OECD are designed to help public officials protect the public interest at every stage of the data lifecycle. They go beyond compliance—emphasising public integrity, trust, and responsible innovation.

The principles stress:

  • Putting people and the public interest at the centre
  • Being transparent, inclusive and accountable
  • Managing risks proactively, especially in automated decision-making

Here are the OECD’s 10 Good Practice Principles for Data Ethics in the Public Sector:

  1. Manage data with integrity
  2. Be aware of and observe relevant government-wide arrangements for trustworthy data access, sharing and use
  3. Incorporate data ethical considerations into governmental, organisational and public sector decision-making processes
  4. Monitor and retain control over data inputs, in particular those used to inform the development and training of AI systems, and adopt a risk-based approach to the automation of decisions
  5. Be specific about the purpose of data use, especially in the case of personal data
  6. Define boundaries for data access, sharing and use
  7. Be clear, inclusive and open
  8. Publish open data and source code
  9. Broaden individuals’ and collectives’ control over their data
  10. Be accountable and proactive in managing risks

Public trust in government is shaped not just by what services are delivered, but how they are delivered, and that increasingly means how data is handled. As digital technologies and AI become part of the machinery of public decision-making, it’s not enough to comply with the law. Citizens expect more: transparency, fairness, inclusion, and accountability.

These principles recognise that data is never neutral. The choices made by public officials – what data to collect, how to use it, when to automate – have real consequences for people’s lives. The OECD’s guidance offers a practical compass: helping governments navigate complexity without losing sight of the human stakes involved.

The blurb

The Good Practice Principles for Data Ethics in the Public Sector presented in this paper seek to shed light on the value and practical implications of data ethics in the public sector. They aim to support public officials in the implementation of data ethics in digital government projects, products, and services such that:

  • i) trust is placed at the core of their design and delivery and
  • ii) public integrity is upheld through specific actions taken by governments, public organisations and, at a more granular level, public officials.

Available as a PDF

The Uncertain Promise of Blockchain for Government

This paper came about as a collaboration between us in the OECD’s Digital Government and Data Unit, and our sibling team, the Observatory of Public Sector Innovation (OPSI). It gave me a nice opportunity to work with Jamie Berryhill from OPSI whose previous work had included a focus on AI as well as Blockchains Unchained.

This was a paper for which we commissioned an external consultant: Juho Lindman, an academic at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. Filling out the team was my colleague Mariane from the Digital Government and Data Unit.

While Juho held the pen on the paper, it was a collaborative exercise in framing the argument and grappling with the ideas. I worked with Mariane on the 4th chapter and the discussion about digital maturity. For me it’s vital that in any conversation about blockchain we talk far less about its potential as a solution, and far more about whether public sector teams are equipped to ask the right questions and choose the right tools.

Because let’s be clear – in most cases, blockchain (or distributed ledger technology) is not the answer. This paper doesn’t just say “don’t believe the hype”, it explores why the hype emerged, how governments can see through it, and what to do instead.

This isn’t a framework in the same sense as some of our other OECD outputs so it doesn’t frequently feature in our in-country analysis. However it has been a helpful reference point for others with at least 40 citations (as of June 2025). And we hope it is helping to shift the conversation from “look at all these blockchain pilots!” to a more sober “perhaps blockchain isn’t the panacea we thought.”

We were invited to speak on a number of panels off the back of this work, and while the blockchain conversation continues to evolve, this paper remains a valuable counterbalance — especially in a public sector still vulnerable to buzzwords.

Available as a PDF

What’s the TL;DR?

Governments around the world have explored blockchain technologies, often with great fanfare. But beyond a few small pilots, meaningful public sector impact has been minimal.

This paper asks why — and offers four angles to understand what’s really going on:

  • Is blockchain viable, valuable, or vital for government?
  • What myths have inflated expectations?
  • What distinguishes projects that succeed (or don’t)?
  • And are teams equipped to make wise choices?

It’s not anti-blockchain. But it is sceptical. And where many saw disruption, this paper encouraged reflection.

Themes in the paper

Blockchain: Viable, Valuable, or Vital?

The paper proposes a simple but effective lens: that blockchain might be viable (technically possible), but that doesn’t make it valuable (worth doing), or vital (essential). Public sector adoption often leaps to the latter categories without pausing to assess whether a blockchain is even needed. Our contention is that it is only those situations where all three criteria are met that blockchain should be part of the discussion.

Produced by the OECD but adapted from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-16/cognitive-technologies-businessapplications.html.

10 myths about blockchain in the public sector

The second chapter of the paper is dedicated to some myth-busting. Juho systematically engaged with the following ten myths

MythResponse
(Public) blockchains are disrupting the public sector all around the worldBlockchain-related public services that have actual users are very rare
It is impossible to build successful blockchain applications for the public sectorThere is no obvious reason the public sector could not develop, implement, and use blockchain solutions
There is one obvious way to apply blockchain technology in the public sectorBlockchain could bring benefits to a number of areas
If you build it, users will comeUsers need to be presented with the benefits of blockchain-enabled services
If it is blockchain, it needs to be big and disruptiveSmall, pragmatic, and evolutive blockchain implementations are just as valuable
Nobody knows how blockchains are implementedTechnology and corresponding skills have developed in both the public and
private sectors in recent years, and there is greater access to external skills (e.g., through partnerships or procurement)
Blockchain is a generic technological solution, like AIUses for blockchain technology are much more limited in their scope
We are not tech people and should not care about detailed design decisions like blockchainDecoupling design from the implementation does not seem warranted
Results of blockchain projects contribute to blockchain knowledgeExperimentation is important, but those lessons and takeaways should be shared
Users care that services are based on blockchainAll other things being equal (e.g., equitable decisions, privacy of personal information, etc.), service end users do not generally care which technological infrastructure provides them with a service

    Success and non-success in government blockchain projects

    The paper investigates a number of different examples of public sector blockchain projects, looking to determine whether any of them have achieved any levels of ‘success’. We were interested in projects:

    • that have already launched (“gone live”) and obtained users
    • where the user base is not limited to test users
    • where users are demonstrating continued use of the service

    We further considered success in terms of projects themselves, or in the benefits it brought to organisations.

    In the case of projects we felt that these ideas would contribute to the success of a project:

    • addressing a clear, specific business goal
    • using appropriate technology
    • identifying and managing relevant stakeholders
    • engage end users with the service’s design
    • addressing problems encountered during implementation and pursuing unforeseen opportunities

    While on the other side of the coin, we felt that these were non-success factors that would prevent good blockchain based outcomes:

    • disruptive projects are generally more complex and difficult to implement at scale
    • deploying projects with limited scalability may be impossible or not worth the effort (notwithstanding the learning opportunities they provide)
    • the lack of clarity regarding the legal or regulative side hinders service deployment

    Teams, maturity, and organisational readiness

    The blockchain question is almost never about the chain itself but whether or not the organisation has the capability to weigh options calmly, test ideas quickly, and adopt the right tool for the job. Mature teams:

    • understand the problem before the technology;
    • use the viable / valuable / vital test to filter hype;
    • work in-the-open, iterating with real users; and
    • draw on a common, government-wide platform of standards, data and guidance.

    When those ingredients are missing, the conversation shouldn’t be “Should we do a blockchain project?” but “Why are we vulnerable to shiny-object syndrome in the first place?”

    In other words, this paper doesn’t banish blockchain, it simply raises the bar. Only when a team shows real digital maturity, and only when all three V’s line up, does a blockchain solution make sense.

    The blurb

    Blockchain remains a hot topic for digital transformation and innovation. In the private sector, blockchain has demonstrated disruptive potential through proven use cases. However, despite strong interest and greater awareness, blockchain has had minimal impact on the public sector, where few projects have moved beyond small pilots. At the same time, there is a growing scepticism and cynicism about public sector blockchain. This paper seeks to understand why this is, by analysing the latest research in the area and identifying and analysing government experiences with successful and unsuccessful projects. It provides early findings on beliefs, characteristics, and practices related to government blockchain projects and the organisations that seek to implement them, with a focus on factors contributing to success or non-success. Although blockchain has yet to affect government in the ways that early hype predicted, government decision makers will nonetheless need to understand and monitor this emerging technology. 

    Available as a PDF

    The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework

    This is arguably a seminal piece in the landscape of thinking about ‘digital government’. This Policy Framework provides the analytical foundation to the work that the OECD’s Digital Government and Data Unit performs with it providing the basis for structuring Digital Government Reviews and, perhaps crucially, offering the intellectual foundations for the forthcoming Digital Government Index and the efforts to measure digital government maturity around the world.

    This framework is a joint effort with different members of the team contributing different chapters and Barbara providing the overall leadership to splice those efforts together. I’m quite proud to have contributed the chapter on Government as a Platform, which is a subject close to my heart (and one I first wrote about on this blog back in 2012),

    The full framework is available as a PDF on the OECD’s website.

    What’s the TL;DR?

    The Six Pillars of Digital Government: Foundations for the Future

    The OECD’s Digital Government Policy Framework (DGPF) is much more than a set of guidelines; it’s the foundation for how governments across the world can reimagine public service delivery in the digital age.

    Why Digital Government Needs Six Dimensions

    Governments are facing increasing demands to be agile, transparent, and responsive. The framework’s six dimensions – Digital by Design, Data-Driven Public Sector, Government as a Platform, Open by Default, User-Driven, and Proactiveness – provide the basis for public sectors to achieve these goals. These dimensions don’t stand alone; they are interdependent and essential for creating a government that is fit for the digital era.

    1. Digital by Design:
      The heart of digital transformation is embedding digital in every aspect of government from the outset. This isn’t about bolting on technology to outdated processes; it’s about creating a strategic and systematic approach to policy-making, using digital as the backbone for every stage of government operations.
    2. Data-Driven Public Sector:
      Governments must recognise data as a critical asset. This dimension underscores the importance of data governance, ethical use, and openness. Data is more than a by-product; it is a core driver of how policies are formulated, monitored, and evaluated.
    3. Government as a Platform:
      Government as a platform moves away from siloed services and towards a more ecosystem-based approach. By creating reusable tools, services, and infrastructure, governments can empower service teams to focus on the unique needs of their users, driving both innovation and efficiency.
    4. Open by Default:
      Open government data, open decision-making processes, and transparency are key to creating trust and accountability. This dimension calls on governments to make openness the default setting, ensuring that public information is accessible and useful.
    5. User-Driven:
      Services should be designed with the user in mind, not based on the convenience of government structures. This dimension emphasizes the importance of designing services based on real user needs and ensuring that they are accessible, inclusive, and responsive.
    6. Proactiveness:
      Governments shouldn’t wait for citizens to come to them—they should anticipate needs and provide services proactively. Whether it’s using data to predict service demands or creating channels for continuous user feedback, proactiveness is about making government services as seamless as those in the private sector.

    What Comes Next?

    These six dimensions are not static. They are the foundation for the ongoing digital transformation that every government must go through. The OECD’s Digital Government Index is the next step, providing a quantitative measure of how well countries are performing across these dimensions. The framework will also continue to evolve, just as we must evolve our approach to digital government.

    The full framework is available as a PDF on the OECD’s website.

    The blurb

    This paper presents the OECD Digital Government Policy Framework (DGPF), a policy instrument to help governments identifying key determinants for effective design and implementation of strategic approaches to transition towards higher levels of digital maturity of their public sectors. This analytical work builds on the provisions of the OECD Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies and supports the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the Secretariat across countries and individual projects.

    The DGPF provides the ground for peer reviews and frames the design of the methodology and the OECD Survey on Digital Government to measure countries’ digital government maturity across the six dimensions covered in this Framework: digital by design, data-driven public sector, government as a platform, open by default, user-driven and proactiveness. The document is enriched with countries’ practices to illustrate the concepts covered in each of the six dimensions of the DGPF.

    The full framework is available as a PDF on the OECD’s website.

    Open data: concepts

    This entry is part 1 of 6 in the series Open data: magic from the inside out?


    redkid absolut data by Libertic, from Flickr

    redkid absolut data by Libertic, from Flickr

    My time at Hull City Council has coincided with an emerging Open Data movement leading calls for greater transparency in the public sector. That has raised questions for my organisation and led to a lot of circular conversations. Recently things have started to change in a way that has got me thinking that perhaps the magic of open data is found from the inside out. Hopefully this series of posts will explain what I mean.

    ‘Open Data’

    In some circles these two little words ‘open’ and ‘data’ have prompted much debate and discussion. Touted as making the public sector more accountable. Seen as an opportunity that excites because of tools it might make possible. But in other circles it’s an alien subject and a phrase that can be a little bit obtuse to those outside the choir.

    Yes it is a phrase that means everything to the data evangelist but perhaps, as Graham suggests, it’s actually an idea that needs to die?
    Continue reading

    I like QR

    QRcode for bm.wel.by

    QR codes are prolific but it doesn’t seem as though people are actually using them, or convinced by their value. I like them but I can understand that agnosticism because they seem to be added for the sake of it rather than because they add any value for the person doing the scanning.

    The code on this post is just like that but it was two things I saw today that prompted me to write this. Firstly, via the quite excellent WTFQRcodes.com  Continue reading

    Newer posts »